PUBLICATION

Soft tissue augmentation procedures at second-stage surgery: a systematic review.

Bassetti RG1, Stähli A2, Bassetti MA2, Sculean A2.

Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Sep;20(7):1369-87. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1815-2. Epub 2016 Apr 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of different soft tissue augmentation/correction methods in terms of increasing the peri-implant width of keratinized mucosa (KM) and/or gain of soft tissue volume during second-stage surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Screening of two databases, MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE (OVID), and hand search of related articles, were performed. Human studies reporting on soft tissue augmentation/correction methods around submucosally osseointegrated implantsduring second-stage surgery up to July 31, 2015 were considered. Quality assessment of the selected full-text articles was performed according to the Cochrane collaboration's tool to assess the risk of bias.

RESULTS:

Overall, eight prospective studies (risk of bias: high) and two case series (risk of bias: high) were included. Depending on the surgical technique and graft material used, the enlargement of keratinized tissue (KT) ranged between -0.20 and 9.35 mm. An apically positioned partial-thickness flap/vestibuloplasty (APPTF/VP) in combination with a free gingival graft (FGG) or a xenogeneic graft material (XCM) was most effective. Applying a roll envelope flap (REF) or an APPTF in combination with a subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG), mean increases in soft tissue volumes of 2.41 and 3.10 mm, respectively, were achieved. Due to the heterogeneity of study designs, no meta-analysis could be performed.

CONCLUSIONS:

Within the limitations of this review, regarding the enlargement of peri-implant KT, the APPTF in the maxilla and the APPTF/VP in combination with FGG or XCM in the lower and upper jaw seem to provide acceptable outcomes. To augment peri-implant soft tissue volume REF in the maxilla or APPTF + SCTG in the lower and upper jaw appear to be reliable treatment options.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE:

The localization in the jaw and the clinical situation are crucial for the decision which second-stage procedure should be applied.

  • AIM Academy - Always Implantology
    Headquarters
    Rue Mercerie 12
    CH-1003 Lausanne
    Switzerland
  • Phone : +41 78 721 27 40
    E-Mail : info@alwaysimplantology.com